The following statement is allowed which should not
Int?? test2
If we have
A:B??
then this is currently interpreted as
[A:B?]
due to this bug
This could also be interpreted as
[A:B?]?
but I do not know what is should do, following the bnf grammer is should do this.
Following the bnf grammer then will
A:B:C???
interpreted as
[A:[B:C?]?]?
current implementation will do
[A:[B:C?]?]
brianSat 10 Apr 2010
Promoted to ticket #1066 and assigned to brian
brianThu 6 May 2010
Ticket resolved in 1.0.53
Yeah that problem slipped thru the way the parser code was organized for parsing things like Foo?[]?, but I added an explicit check to disallow that condition.
jessevdam Wed 7 Apr 2010
The following statement is allowed which should not
If we have
then this is currently interpreted as
due to this bug
This could also be interpreted as
but I do not know what is should do, following the bnf grammer is should do this.
Following the bnf grammer then will
interpreted as
current implementation will do
brian Sat 10 Apr 2010
Promoted to ticket #1066 and assigned to brian
brian Thu 6 May 2010
Ticket resolved in 1.0.53
Yeah that problem slipped thru the way the parser code was organized for parsing things like
Foo?[]?, but I added an explicit check to disallow that condition.