Has anyone gotten this working? last I tried it complained about 32 vs 64 bit blahblahlblah (stupid SWT!) Or if anyone has any tips on what I need to put where to build it locally, that'd work for me, too.
tcolarTue 11 Aug 2009
I get errors like that on linux if use the jdk32 bits (which I need to make flash work in browser) on my 64 bits machine.
I think Fan / OS loads the 32 or 64 bits native libraries according to your system, but if your Java runtime is not matching(32 bits) you will get things like that.
So make your your JDK match the architecture.
andyTue 11 Aug 2009
I installed a fresh copy of 1.0.45 on my MBP running Leopard a few weeks ago. Flux came up and ran fine for me. I don't remember ever installing anything outside of that, but its possible I did.
qualidafialTue 11 Aug 2009
Fan should be packaging up both 32- and 64-bit jars and selecting between them at runtime. This includes Linux too.
cheeserTue 11 Aug 2009
I changed my VM to the 32 bit 1.5 (there's no 32 bit 1.6 apparently) and flux loads. So that's good news. Maybe I'll play with FWT now... Thanks for the tip. I hadn't thought about changing to the 32 bit VM. duh. ;)
brianTue 11 Aug 2009
Fan should be packaging up both 32- and 64-bit jars and selecting between them at runtime. This includes Linux too.
Neither Andy nor I have the ability to test 64-bit Windows, OS X, or Linux.
But as I said before, if someone wants to verify things work and send me the files I am happy to add it to the core distribution (assuming no one minds adding additional big files to the core).
cheeser Tue 11 Aug 2009
Has anyone gotten this working? last I tried it complained about 32 vs 64 bit blahblahlblah (stupid SWT!) Or if anyone has any tips on what I need to put where to build it locally, that'd work for me, too.
tcolar Tue 11 Aug 2009
I get errors like that on linux if use the jdk32 bits (which I need to make flash work in browser) on my 64 bits machine.
I think Fan / OS loads the 32 or 64 bits native libraries according to your system, but if your Java runtime is not matching(32 bits) you will get things like that.
So make your your JDK match the architecture.
andy Tue 11 Aug 2009
I installed a fresh copy of 1.0.45 on my MBP running Leopard a few weeks ago. Flux came up and ran fine for me. I don't remember ever installing anything outside of that, but its possible I did.
qualidafial Tue 11 Aug 2009
Fan should be packaging up both 32- and 64-bit jars and selecting between them at runtime. This includes Linux too.
cheeser Tue 11 Aug 2009
I changed my VM to the 32 bit 1.5 (there's no 32 bit 1.6 apparently) and flux loads. So that's good news. Maybe I'll play with FWT now... Thanks for the tip. I hadn't thought about changing to the 32 bit VM. duh. ;)
brian Tue 11 Aug 2009
Neither Andy nor I have the ability to test 64-bit Windows, OS X, or Linux.
But as I said before, if someone wants to verify things work and send me the files I am happy to add it to the core distribution (assuming no one minds adding additional big files to the core).
Long term repo management should solve this.