Ticket #865
fwt::TreeModel.children has a nullable return type. However, the default implementation of has children requires the value to be non-null.
// From src/fwt/fan/Tree.fan virtual Bool hasChildren(Obj node) { return !children(node).isEmpty } virtual Obj[]? children(Obj node) { return null }
It seems to me like the return type on children should simply be made non-nullable. Why have two different ways to show you're subtree is empty?
All your base are belong to us
Renamed from fwt::TreeModel Error to Make fwt::TreeModel.children non-nullable
Promoted to ticket #865 and assigned to brian
Ticket resolved in 1.0.48
changeset
Login or Signup to reply.
tactics Fri 11 Dec 2009
fwt::TreeModel.children has a nullable return type. However, the default implementation of has children requires the value to be non-null.
// From src/fwt/fan/Tree.fan virtual Bool hasChildren(Obj node) { return !children(node).isEmpty } virtual Obj[]? children(Obj node) { return null }It seems to me like the return type on children should simply be made non-nullable. Why have two different ways to show you're subtree is empty?
helium Fri 11 Dec 2009
All your base are belong to us
brian Sat 12 Dec 2009
Renamed from fwt::TreeModel Error to Make fwt::TreeModel.children non-nullable
brian Sat 12 Dec 2009
Promoted to ticket #865 and assigned to brian
brian Sat 12 Dec 2009
Ticket resolved in 1.0.48
changeset